Al Magaloff rrMaster Location: 12,199 Posts- Enough Time Wasted. See Ya!
| Just to elaborate on Lwnemesis' s torque statement. You're correct that torque is what we are really interested in. I make my living in the hi- performance auto and marine industry. I have used an illustration of a tractor trailer many times with my customers. The numbers may not be perfect, but the science is sound. Say we build a hi-performance Chevy 350cid V-8 engine that dynos at 400hp@say 6500rpm. The torque output of this engine would be around 375foot pounds. If you put this engine in a Camaro or some other 3000lb car, it would be very impressive.Now, we have a tractor trailer that weighs 80,000 lbs, and is powered by a 6 cylinder diesel Cat with the same 400hp but making around 12-1400 foot pounds of torque. If you put the Chevy engine in the tractor trailer, it probably would not get it to move, or would not pull the load down the road. Also, the Cat put into the Camaro would be anything but impressive. The IMZ motor mount difference will be an issue for most people, too bad they could not have gotten around that . I'm planning on milling up a billet aluminium mount for a Raptor 30 stretched to 50 size. I'm bored with the carburetor. I've been tweaking them in automotive for over thirty years, and RC for twenty. For me, it's time for something different. If we don't buy the new products, there will be no incentive for the companies to develop them. The entire RC helicopter market will fit on the head of a pin, in the scheme of things. You're not talking about a huge market. If you think you are "getting ripped off" you don't know what engineering and manufacturing of a new design costs. I would like to see an affordable digital fuel injection sometime soon. OS has an entry in that area now, but it's big dough......Sorry for the killer post!.....later...Al |