scatbass Heliman Location: Hiram, GA
| | Quote |
| When we let the value of a thing decide our action when someone violates our rights, then we give the go ahead to do whatever they will. Put yourself in ERAUEAGLEs shoes, you would want some a$$ if it where you. It is the principal of the matter.
|
As some of you may remember - my car was recently totaled. When I went to retrieve my personal goods from the vehicle a week after it had been towed from the scene, I found that about $5 - $10 in change had been removed from the cup holder. Everything else I had left in there was intact.
Was I pissed? Yes - not because of the value, but because of the principal. I also learned a valuable lesson though...never leave any personal belongings in a car that is being towed from a scene like that, because people as a whole are not trustworthy.
If it were an iPod or something of similar value, I would have filed a formal complaint with the yard that was holding the car, and gone through what I needed to in order to get it back...simply knowing that I had a good chance to do so. The $5 was not worth it, IMO.
In the OPs situation, on the other hand, he put himself (naively) into a somewhat more precarious situation. It is what it is. If Apple really makes it very simple to begin the retrieval process, then by all means go for it.
Sure I'd be pissed, but it comes down to the value of the time and effort I will need to expend, vs. the value of the item I am retrieving. We can be pragmatic and say that it is the principal of the matter, but I don't think we would be having this discussion if it was a $5 item instead.
That said, what is the dollar value cutoff where a stolen item should be retrieved vs. let go?
Mike |