llamont Senior Heliman Location: California
| Hello all:
| Quote |
| The axe cp was a money pit got rid of that too. I was able to fly and hover the axe cp all over (6 crashes in total) and the CX2 (one broken blade only since ownership). Ive mastered all orientations etc with it so I feel its time to move on to something good and scale'ish maybe something bigger for scale. I really dont find helis that bad and as hard as everyone says thus far. Maybe its just me..maybe I have the thumbs for it who knows.
|
I hate to break it to you but you get what you pay for. The co-axial machines are nice to play with but the flight performance of a CX2 really cannot be compared to the flight performance of a full function, collective pitch helicopter. Your summary of the Blade 400 seems consistent with other reviews that I have heard about the product. People have said that the Blade 400's electronic components are generic and should be replaced in order to get the most potential out of the aircraft. Having not flown a stock (or upgraded) Blade 400, I cannot offer you anymore than hearsay.
What is wrong with the Trex 450? They are very popular, parts are cheap and they seem to be available everywhere, and they fly great when properly setup. The Mini Titan E-325 is also a great choice as it's stability has to be witnessed to be believed. I'm flying an HDX 450 V3, I'm working on a Mikado Logo 10, and I also fly a Trex 600E. I have flown the Trex 450 and the Mini Titan and they are both great ships. The Trex seems to be lighter and more agile and the Mini Titan is slightly heavier and more stable.
As far as your style of flying is concerned, maybe you should check out some of the F3C schedules. For more information on F3C, check out the F3C/FAI section here on RR.
Take care and safe flying Loren |