Hooker50 New Heliman Location: lacey, WA, USA
| I've not flown a RC Chinook, but I have flown the 1-1 scale version. A couple of terms I've notice sound confusing to a helicopter guy, me, so I'll clarify them.
Helicopter vs. Airplane terminology: Pitch = elevator Roll = aileron Yaw = rudder Collective (called thrust in Chinooks) = power
Semantics, I know, but though the application has the same effect, the application itself is completely different.
To expand on what was said earlier in the post, a full size Chinook has 2 stage mixing bell-cranks that effectively take 4 inputs (thrust, pitch, roll, yaw) and combine them to 2 inputs going to both forward and aft heads.
Yaw input alone will rotate the helicopter about the center axis. Though to get the helicopter to rotate around the access of either fwd or aft head will require a combination of roll and yaw input. To think this through, imagine a yaw input. As described before, this will rotate each swash plate in a different direction. Then imagine a roll input where the swash plates move in the same direction. Piecing it together like this is how I remember the mechanical aspect of this maneuver.
Differential pitch is correct. We call it Differential Collective Pitch (DCP) in Chinooks. I’m not sure of the verbiage in the CH-46 communities. Think of DCP as a 1-1 input respective to each head. If you move the cyclic forward, the forward head will decrease the amount of collective input the same amount that the aft head will increase its amount of collective input, and vice versa.
A side note about why Chinooks come to a hover nose up. If it was built to scale, the forward head while the helicopter is on the ground is lower then the aft head. This will cause the nose to pull up when power is applied to become level with the aft head before the helicopter will enter a steady, level hover. Plus the forward transmission (xmsn) is tilted forward 9 degrees and the aft xmsn is tilted forward 4.5 degrees.
Trivial information I know. But hopefully this helps in understanding your models better. |