ehn Senior Heliman Location: Fairfax Station, VA
| Heliman, I disagree with one of your points - "I don't know how you assembled it but a more positive contact joint wouldn't have allowed that type of failure."
Let's assume a worst case scenario of a crash, with severe stress to the TR system, anywhere from the main gears to the TR gearbox. What is going to fail? It may be anything from the gears (main or TR), the TT itself, the couplers, etc. At some point something has to fail, and it does not neccessarily imply a design failure.
However, I agree completely with your other point: - "The same people who are excoriating you may have, or have had, a failure and I'm sure that they have or will attribute it to their poor assembly skills. Poor quality or bad design is not an option."
Right on! Anyone who flys much sees people who crash that blame it on the radio when it's mechanical or someone on their frequency.
You also said - "For example, if a tail hub breaks while flying, they must have overtightened it during assembly and stretched it. These people will defend themselves to the nines because they've done this simple assembly step many times before. However, the rest of us will deride them."
Or, someone crashes, sees stripped splines on a coupler, and discounts any other cause. Then if someone suggests another cause, they go bonkers. Gosh, remember when Charles had the nerve to suggest an alternate scenario (nicely), and Droid WENT BEZERK?! Thanks for making a great point!
Long Island Eric |