DarkHorse1 Senior Heliman Location: Gloucester UK
| As you would expect with the extra weight and lower RPM the handling is quite a bit more docile than any Hornet. Once I began to understand the slight handling differences on a 3 blade configuration, I was quite happy with the flight characteristics of the current setup (as in video) but it took a bit of fiddling to get smooth enough to enjoy flying. Hence not for beginner builders.
I set the CofG +15mm in front of main shaft with a few clicks of forward trim. In the video you can hear my pitch curves need some attention as the RPMs rise nearer full pitch, on climbout and when falling into dirty air effect, encountering moderate 'ring vortex state' (same as all my micro's). Note that I am using the EM350/20 (Axi 2212/20 12A 1150 rpm/v 57g) with the 8A MS-116 for ~2350 rpm, so don't mind being a little soft on pitch demands to keep a safe ESC current draw.
Running a lower RPM (2100 rpm) causes the cyclic stability to become less comfortable and can begin to feel like flying a dinner plate in a breeze.
Not sure about the FFF handling yet and don't expect it to be as fast a an X-3D, completely different machine requirements for a 1:20 scale heli. Would the speed scale up the same as the physical size? On paper the Ecuruil at 2300 rpm should maximum FF around +40mph (if it had a flybar), the stock X-3D should have a maximum FFF speed of around 50mph and a T-Rex maybe 70mph (going by the 1/3 tips speed method). Probably get FF handling related issues starting to become noticeable at 60% max FF.
> To start using a three bladed head would it be better to put one on one of my Hornets? I didn't want to take my favourite X-3D out of agile action (only one at the time). Best to just fly the Ecuruil without fuselage for a while, although the CofG is more tail heavy with the fuse, it does give you chance to get the setup dialled in, smoothed out and possibly take a crash or two without wrecking all the time and effort you put into the fuselage construction. |